Spatial consistency and bias in avalanche forecasts - a case study in the European Alps - INSU - Institut national des sciences de l'Univers Access content directly
Journal Articles NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES Year : 2018

Spatial consistency and bias in avalanche forecasts - a case study in the European Alps

Frank Techel
  • Function : Author
Christoph Mitterer
  • Function : Author
Elisabetta Ceaglio
  • Function : Author
Cécile Coléou
  • Function : Author
Francesca Rastelli
  • Function : Author
Ross S. Purves
  • Function : Author

Abstract

In the European Alps, the public is provided with regional avalanche forecasts, issued by about 30 forecast centers throughout the winter, covering a spatially contiguous area. A key element in these forecasts is the communication of avalanche danger according to the five-level, ordinal European Avalanche Danger Scale (EADS). Consistency in the application of the avalanche danger levels by the individual forecast centers is essential to avoid misunderstandings or misinterpretations by users, particularly those utilizing bulletins issued by different forecast centers. As the quality of avalanche forecasts is difficult to verify, due to the categorical nature of the EADS, we investigated forecast goodness by focusing on spatial consistency and bias, exploring real forecast danger levels from four winter seasons (477 forecast days). We describe the operational constraints associated with the production and communication of the avalanche bulletins, and we propose a methodology to quantitatively explore spatial consistency and bias. We note that the forecast danger level agreed significantly less often when compared across national and forecast center boundaries (about 60 %) than within forecast center boundaries (about 90 %). Furthermore, several forecast centers showed significant systematic differences in terms of more frequently using lower (or higher) danger levels than their neighbors. Discrepancies seemed to be greatest when analyzing the proportion of forecasts with danger level 4 - high and 5 - very high. The size of the warning regions, the smallest geographically clearly specified areas underlying the forecast products, differed considerably between forecast centers. Region size also had a significant impact on all summary statistics and is a key parameter influencing the issued danger level, but it also limits the communication of spatial variations in the danger level. Operational constraints in the production and communication of avalanche forecasts and variation in the ways the EADS is interpreted locally may contribute to inconsistencies and may be potential sources for misinterpretation by forecast users. All these issues highlight the need to further harmonize the forecast production process and the way avalanche hazard is communicated to increase consistency and hence facilitate cross-border forecast interpretation by traveling users.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
nhess-18-2697-2018.pdf (3.82 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

insu-03668348 , version 1 (15-05-2022)

Licence

Identifiers

Cite

Frank Techel, Christoph Mitterer, Elisabetta Ceaglio, Cécile Coléou, Samuel Morin, et al.. Spatial consistency and bias in avalanche forecasts - a case study in the European Alps. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 18, pp.2697-2716. ⟨10.5194/nhess-18-2697-2018⟩. ⟨insu-03668348⟩
70 View
16 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More